Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jessie Fischbein's avatar

2 thoughts:

1) What is the concept of heter for a d'oraisa if it is "just" a quality of life mental health issue and not life threatening. How far does power extend to grant a heter. Is it different in this case in this climate as the gender of clothing is more fluid. Do we say אנוס רחמנא פטריה--is that the basis of a *heter* that you can tell someone with compulsions "don't feel so bad about it" or is that more of a reality but that doesn't mean it's a heter

2) I can think of other mitzvos that Orthodox Jews abstain from that we do maintain must have some wisdom but doesn't make a person "morally inherently bad" for doing it: Eating bacon. Not cross-breeding vegetables and fruits. Not wearing wool and linen together (yep, I know it's often cited as "nobody does this" but Orthodox Jews DO keep this pretty scrupulously and have "shatnez labs" and people trained to check the fiber of clothes to see if there is both wool and linen in the clothes).

Expand full comment
nechamachayah's avatar

-3

This entire discussion would only apply if there was a specific clothing that was exclusively for genetic born females. (As was the case in the time of chazal)

Since nowadays transgender is accepted all feminine(and masculine) clothing are intended for both genetic born sex to choose what style they prefer, essentially rending all clothing halachikly unisex.

"דביתהו דרבי יהודה נפקת נקטת עמרא עבדה גלימא דהוטבי כד נפקת לשוקא מיכסיא ביה וכד נפיק רבי יהודה לצלויי הוה מיכסי ומצלי וכד מיכסי ביה" (נדרים מט.ב)

"אמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל ואפילו להבחין בין בגדו לבגדי אשתו אמר רבא לא אמרן אלא דבני מחוזא" [רש"י:מפנקי ולא עבדי מלאכה ובגדיהם רחבים כשל אשה וצריכים עיון] (שבת יב.א)

Expand full comment

No posts